Josh+H+Archive+1

Back to Josh H

I was really surprised that people know how to do Wiki Coding. Even though the wikispaces wiki coding is different to any real wiki. On that note I think our school should have its own wiki, that would be much better than using wikispaces, then you can link between different subjects for the younger year levels and not have to swap resources between the different grades, just link to the same page!

See, people at our school don't think of these things.

> No, they don't. It's kinda annoying, but then, a _LOT_ of stuff annoys me. Like americans.Or soft cheese 1233369811 >> Yeah.. silly people, why use stupid wikispaces.. A real wiki is WAY better, they could rule the world! Well, maybe not, but still.... --1234258910 >>> Yes, hang on to that 'but still...', it could be worth a lot one day 1234333014 >>>> Yes, its a 'but still...' made of crude oil. --1234349866 >>>>> Or BMWs --1234386611 >>>>>> Or does it? --1234933401 >>>>>>> Yes, it does 1234991567 >>>>>>>> You're right. --1235035993 >>>>>>>>> I always am ;) 1235077020

Close Analysis - Chapter 3‏
//I don't know if I did this correctly but here goes://

This passage in chapter three "decided my [Victory Frankenstein's] future destiny". It affects what and how Victor will learn, greatly affecting the thoughts on the topic of his study and his works.

Victory rethinks his beliefs in the science of Natural Philosophy and decides to develop into chemistry, science and mathematics. Here he first learns about science and the modern equipment. //What leads you to draw this conclusion. Is it the language, the imagry, symbols, mood. Does Victor's behaviour reinforce this?// The modern look of science tells Victor what he has to do to succeed in his modern pursuits and this leads to his creation of the monster and his eventual demise. From Victors reading of Cornelius Agrippa and Paracelsus he believed that he could make claims and do the impossible. In essence this is what he did do but that wouldn't have been done without his discussion with M. Waldman. //What's the significance of their discussion. Break it down but don't fall into the trap of retelling the events in the extract. Analyse the characters, their language, behaviour, relationships. How are you feeling as the reader? How are the characters feeling? What's causing this?// Mary Shelly compared M. Waldman's speech to M. Krempe's and also compared their look. She wrote the book so that the new style (the modern style) was much better looking than the older style. //What do you mean? // She also included a few metaphors that would convey her point in a more visual manner, showing how this affected Victor more clearly. //And these metaphores are? Don't be afraid to explore them, put forward your ideas and interpretations of these.1234698856 //